Strange Bedfellows: What Does BLM Have In Common With Independent Journalist Michael Shellenberger?
Strange Bedfellows: What Does BLM Have In Common With Independent Journalist Michael Shellenberger?
Both are calling out the DNC's un-democratic process of "installing" Kamala Harris as the Democrat nominee for president.
(PLEASE NOTE: The audio file cut off the last 5-1/2 paragraphs. My apologies.)
The news cycle the last several weeks has been mind-bending/boggling and exhausting. Thankfully, there are people and publications that present information to us in an impartial, thoughtful and FACTUAL manner—unlike so many in the corporate media. Their reporting allows us to suss out nuances that may contribute to a varying perspective, resulting in a deeper understanding of the subject at hand.
Michael Shellenberger’s publication, “Public”, is one such example of an entity that provides unbiased and groundbreaking reporting—oftentimes covering subjects from an angle that the left-leaning mainstream media outlets refuse to touch upon. He respects our intelligence and challenges us to look deeper.
One such case in point: Joe Biden stepping down and Kamala Harris being proclaimed the “Anointed One” by the Democrat big bosses, donors, and media. Shellenberger’s reporting has been invigoratingly unrelenting, putting out videos, articles, and posts almost daily across Substack and various social media outlets. It is must-read/hear material.
Below is an excerpt from Public’s Substack video/article, “Democratic Elites Subvert Democracy For The Third Time Since 2016.” (1:50)
READ SALIENT EXCERPTS FROM SHELLENBERGER’S VIDEO/ARTICLE BELOW. (Link to full article following the excerpts. Bold highlights are mine.)
“…this is the third time in three presidential elections that Democratic Party elites have subverted democracy to choose a presidential candidate.
The first time this occurred was in 2016 when the Democratic National Committee manipulated money and process to help Hillary Clinton defeat Bernie Sanders. The second time was in 2020, when Party elites pushed out Pete Buttigieg and Amy Klobuchar so Elizabeth Warren could split the progressive vote with Sanders, creating a path to victory for Biden.
This year, Biden and the DNC prevented a competitive open primary, and now Biden is deciding who will be the nominee for Democrats. Harris was deeply unpopular with Democratic voters when she ran in the 2020 primary, leading her to drop out after her polling plummeted to the single digits.”
#####
“Over the last three weeks, Biden fought Democratic donors, media elites, and Party leaders. He insisted repeatedly he could do the job. But, in the end, they overwhelmed him. They withheld funding. They attacked almost every day, letting up for just 24 hours after the near-assassination of former President Trump.
As a result, nobody could watch the events of the last few weeks and believe that the Democratic Party is democratic. It is a party controlled by the media, donors, and the deep state.”
#####
“Biden’s announcement that he will not run again is a clear victory for media elites, but it comes at a heavy price. By waiving away Biden’s mental incapacity until it could no longer do so, the media has suffered a major blow to its credibility, greater even than the Russia collusion hoax and Hunter Biden conspiracy theory.
The good news is that just 32% of Americans tell Gallup that they trust the mass media “a fair amount” or “a great deal” to report the news fairly and accurately, which is the lowest level in 52 years. New polling shows that public approval and disapproval of Democrats and Republicans are now the same.
And everything the media and Democratic elites do reinforces the sense that they can’t be trusted. One week after we reported that the Secret Service had denied Trump’s security detail additional help, the Washington Post and New York Times are saying the same thing. And the accusation by Democratic elites that Trump is too old is transparently cynical to everyone, including the Party faithful.”
Click on “Listen now” to access the entire video (5:38) and article.
Note: I had the pleasure of meeting Liberty Forum guest speaker, Michael Shellenberger, in Mountain View, CA in September, 2023. Such a nice guy.
___________________________________________
Black Lives Matter expressed similar concerns as Shellenberger about the subversion of democratic processes and the elimination of the people’s voices and votes in favor of “Democrat Party elites and billionaire donors.” On July 22, they posted a teaser and timeline of events on X (formerly Twitter):
Concurrently, BLM posted an expository article on their website:
https://blacklivesmatter.com/black-lives-matter-statement-on-kamala-harris-securing-enough-delegates-to-become-democratic-nominee/
Read FULL BLM ARTICLE BELOW or click on link above; bold sentences in [ ] are mine.
Black Lives Matter calls on the DNC to host a virtual snap primary.
Washington D.C. – Black Lives Matter demands that the Democratic National Committee (DNC) immediately host an informal, virtual snap primary across the country prior to the DNC convention in August. We call for the Rules Committee to create a process that allows for public participation in the nomination process, not just a nomination by party delegates. The current political landscape is unprecedented, with President Biden stepping aside in a manner never seen before. This moment calls for decisive action to protect the integrity of our democracy and the voices of Black voters.
While Joe Biden wasn’t our preferred candidate, we cannot ignore the troubling actions of the Democratic Party:
[The DNC refused to host debates during the primary, even though a vast majority of Democratic voters wanted them. This would have likely allowed America to see the decline of Joe Biden in 2023.
The DNC changed the primary schedule and created rules that made it almost impossible for non-Biden candidates to appear on the ballot, effectively clearing the field of any challengers to the incumbent president.
Following the primary where millions of Black voters weighed in, after one poor debate performance, the DNC Party elites and billionaire donors bullied Joe Biden out of the race.]
[Now, Democratic Party elites and billionaire donors are attempting to manipulate Black voters by anointing Kamala Harris and an unknown vice president as the new Democratic ticket without a primary vote by the public. This blatant disregard for democratic principles is unacceptable.] While the potential outcome of a Harris presidency may be historic, the process to achieve it must align with true democratic values. We have no idea where Kamala Harris stands on the issues, now that she has assumed Joe Biden’s place, and we have no idea of the record of her potential vice president because we don’t even know who it is yet.
At Black Lives Matter, our focus is on building strong communities, addressing root issues, and creating spaces of justice and joy. This election process has been a disservice to our communities and to democracy. [Historically, Black people have been loyal Democratic voters, but time and again, the party has taken our votes for granted and prioritized political theatrics over our real needs.]
So we will do the hard thing: we will celebrate, and honor the joy many in our community are feeling about Kamala’s historic candidacy and path to the nomination—while calling out the undemocratic process and engaging in a vigorous discussion on the issues our community cares about.
[We do not live in a dictatorship. Delegates are not oligarchs. Any attempt to evade or override the will of voters in our primary system—no matter how historic the candidate—must be condemned.] We demand an informal, virtual snap primary now that the incumbent president is no longer in the running.
For the past few years, the Democratic Party has proclaimed that “democracy is on the ballot” in an effort to persuade Black voters to participate in the upcoming general election. [They have presented this as the most serious election for democracy in our lifetimes. However, democracy isn’t just an ideal to be protected against Republicans; it must also be safeguarded from erosions within the Democratic Party. Calls for “unity” cannot come at the expense of democracy. The Democratic party, which has been the loudest in defending democracy, is now poised to commit some of the most undemocratic maneuvering to avoid listening to the will of the voters.]
D’Zhane Parker, a Black Lives Matter leader, said: “Black Lives Matter is independent of any political party. We focus on fighting racial and economic injustices that impact Black communities. While we may back policies that align with our goals, our commitment is to the liberation of Black people. This independence allows us to hold all political entities accountable and stay true to our mission without party influence.”
We must stand firm against any attempt to silence Black voters and other marginalized communities. This is not just about Biden or Harris; it is about demanding a political system that genuinely represents us and upholds democracy.
Let us be clear: This is about the Democratic Party following a process that protects the legitimacy of any future Democratic president following this unprecedented moment. [Installing Kamala Harris as the Democratic nominee and an unknown vice president without any public voting process would make the modern Democratic Party a party of hypocrites.] It would undermine their credibility on issues related to democracy. Imagine our first Black woman president not having won some sort of public nomination process. The pundits would immediately label it as affirmative action or a DEI move, and any progress made by a President Harris would be on shaky foundations. If Kamala Harris is to be the nominee, it must be through a process that upholds democratic principles and public participation.
Reflecting on history, we remember Shirley Chisholm, the first Black woman to run for the Democratic nomination for president in 1972. She faced significant opposition from the party establishment, underscoring the need to stand firm against undemocratic practices today. [Since 1972, presidential candidates have needed to undergo a vote by the public to receive the nomination, which replaced the era when party bosses controlled the nomination process. Binding primaries were established to ensure that the nominee reflected the will of the people rather than party elites.]
Shalomyah Bowers, a Black Lives Matter leader, said: “This is not an attack on Kamala Harris or Black women, and right now we aren’t questioning Kamala’s qualifications or capabilities. This is about the nominating process. Those of us who care about the principles of democracy cannot be serious about installing Kamala Harris and an unknown vice president as the Democratic nominee without any semblance of a people-powered process. Not delegates and party elites, but actually asking communities across the country if they believe this should be the democratic ticket. Anything less is unserious in the quest for democracy. Democracies are stronger when political parties operate with primary systems that allow for genuine participation.”
[We demand a transparent and fair virtual snap primary to allow for a democratic selection of the nominee. The DNC must address systemic issues, increase transparency, and promote genuine grassroots engagement. Our democracy is strongest when it is inclusive, transparent, and fair.]
So, from now on, perhaps Side A should not fear-monger the citizenry that Side B is a “threat to democracy” when Side A’s actions reflect more of a “threat to democracy” than any nebulous dangers they ascribe to Side B.